Re: Add a hint to the "WAL summaries are required" errors

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Raja Sai Pranav <rajasaipranav0(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add a hint to the "WAL summaries are required" errors
Date: 2026-11-09 12:09:09
Message-ID: C46D92DE-54E3-45EE-BE03-C53CA41E97C9@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 9 Nov 2026, at 11:40, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> So, how about mentioning these alternatives as well?
>
> HINT: Make sure WAL summarization is enabled. Consider using a more
> recent backup as the basis for this incremental backup,
> or taking a new full backup.

+1. Adding a hint as per the original patch is a good idea and your addition
makes it even better.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirill Reshke 2026-11-09 12:10:52 Re: processes stuck in shutdown following OOM/recovery
Previous Message Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla 2026-11-09 11:59:46 Re: Standby stuck after walreceiver restart just before a WAL segment boundary