From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Setting min/max TLS protocol in clientside libpq |
Date: | 2020-01-28 10:29:39 |
Message-ID: | C3B6360E-EC43-4AFF-8D15-B4F3184EE191@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 28 Jan 2020, at 04:53, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Now, we already mention in the docs which values the min and max
> bounds support, and that the version of OpenSSL used by the backend
> and the frontend are impacted by that depending on what version of
> OpenSSL one or the other link to. The remaining piece is that the
> client and the server negotiate the protocol they use, which is an
> obvious fact, at least to me..
You don't really qualify as the target audience for basic, yet not always
universally known/understood, sections in the documentation though =) I've
heard enough complaints that it's complicated to set up that I think we need to
make the docs more digestable, but if noone else +1's then lets drop it.
cheers ./daniel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-01-28 10:44:08 | ReadRecord wrongly assumes randAccess after 38a957316d. |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-01-28 09:56:26 | Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time. |