Re: libpq compression

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Denis Smirnov <sd(at)arenadata(dot)io>, Daniil Zakhlystov <usernamedt(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq compression
Date: 2021-01-12 16:43:28
Message-ID: C3445B09-9D68-4A89-A4BB-01AB63599809@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 12 янв. 2021 г., в 20:47, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> написал(а):
>
>> I think we should come up with an minimal, prelimininary 0001 patch which is
>> common between the 3 compression patches (or at least the two using zstd). The
>> ./configure changes and a compressionlibs struct would also be included. I'm
>> planning to do something like this with the next revision of my patchset.
>>
> It will be great to have such common preliminary patch including zstd support.

+1. I'd also rebase my WAL FPI patch on top of common code.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-01-12 17:04:09 Re: Key management with tests
Previous Message Andrey Borodin 2021-01-12 16:41:19 Re: Spurious "apparent wraparound" via SimpleLruTruncate() rounding