Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Date: 2006-04-01 01:11:04
Message-ID: BF9CA762-EBFE-4A6F-8F8D-458BB81E3B9D@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Mar 31, 2006, at 16:01, Tom Lane wrote:

> It seems rather pointless to document two instances of what is in fact
> a generic autoconf-script behavior ...

I'm sorry to be such a moron about this, but what exactly is that
behavior? That you can specify an environment variable for whatever *
is in --with-*?

Thanks,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Agent M 2006-04-01 01:27:10 listen not schema-aware
Previous Message David Wheeler 2006-04-01 01:09:36 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2006-04-01 01:31:10 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Previous Message David Wheeler 2006-04-01 01:09:36 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?