--On 15. Juni 2011 16:47:55 +0000 Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:
> Or perhaps pg_connections. Yes, +1 to making things fully backwards
> compatible by keeping pg_stat_activity around but making a better
> designed and better named table (view/SRF/whatever).
I thought about that too when reading the thread the first time, but
"pg_stat_sessions" sounds better. Our documentation also primarily refers to a
database connection as a "session", i think.
In response to
- Re: procpid? at 2011-06-15 16:47:55 from Greg Sabino Mullane
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-06-15 16:53:59|
|Subject: Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID|
|Previous:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2011-06-15 16:52:39|
|Subject: Re: bad posix_fadvise support causes initdb to exit ungracefully|