| From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations |
| Date: | 2020-03-18 14:50:11 |
| Message-ID: | BC88FC7D-C296-4D39-8935-9FDFB04C524D@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mar 17, 2020, at 9:33 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:39:35PM -0700, Mark Dilger wrote:
>> I agree that this does not need to be back-patched. I was debating
>> whether it constitutes a bug for the purpose of putting the fix into
>> v13 vs. punting the patch forward to the v14 cycle. I don't have a
>> strong opinion on that.
>
> I don't see any strong argument against fixing this stuff in v13,
> FWIW.
Here is the latest patch. I'll go add this thread to the commitfest app now....
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Adding-missing-Object-Access-hook-invocations.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2020-03-18 15:15:55 | Re: BEFORE ROW triggers for partitioned tables |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2020-03-18 14:33:40 | Thinko in index_concurrently_swap comment |