Re: archive modules

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: archive modules
Date: 2021-11-02 20:57:58
Message-ID: BBF7E83F-461B-42B4-A01B-4DD323B00482@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/2/21, 10:29 AM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree. I'll make sure the archive library can be changed via SIGHUP
> in the next revision.

And here it is.

Nathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Introduce-archive-module-infrastructure.patch application/octet-stream 52.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-11-02 21:06:58 Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-11-02 20:47:06 Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?