| From: | Michael Schmidt <MichaelMSchmidt(at)msn(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Lewis <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com>, Andrei Ilitchev <andrei(dot)ilitchev(at)oracle(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marina Vatkina <Marina(dot)Vatkina(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Subject: | Re: Fw: postgresql experts please help |
| Date: | 2007-10-18 20:20:06 |
| Message-ID: | BAYC1-PASMTP06B82BA1B0737436579E17A39E0@CEZ.ICE |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Michael Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Also, from my read of the documentation and experience, you have to
>> call nextval before you can call currval in the transaction.
>>
>
> Right, but the insert should trigger the default on the serial column to
> call nextval behind the scenes.
>
> Kris Jurka
>
Exactly, because nextval is the default for the sequence. However, if
you do a transaction in which you don't do an insert, then currval won't
be available.
Michael Schmidt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2007-10-18 20:59:57 | Re: [JDBC] Re: 'on insert do instead' rule with a where clause responds 'INSERT 0 0' |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2007-10-18 20:18:42 | Re: Fw: postgresql experts please help |