Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES]

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: mail(at)joeconway(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES]
Date: 2006-08-04 04:43:08
Message-ID: BAY20-F143AB0B68CABA5DB334B10F9500@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


>
>Good point. One question: are we happy calling this a 'VALUES list'? It's
>better than a 'table value constructor'. I took the lead from a comment in
>the
>source.
>

table value constructor is name from ANSI. All people wiil find t.v.c., not
values list. I vote table value constructor.

Regards
Pavel Stehule

_________________________________________________________________
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
http://messenger.msn.cz/

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-04 04:56:26 Re: VALUES clause memory optimization
Previous Message Joe Conway 2006-08-04 04:27:16 Re: VALUES clause memory optimization

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-04 04:45:43 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-04 04:37:10 Re: 8.2 features status

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-04 04:56:26 Re: VALUES clause memory optimization
Previous Message Joe Conway 2006-08-04 04:27:16 Re: VALUES clause memory optimization