You wrote that you ran postgresql on HPUX11.11.
Our Server type: V2500 12CPU 16GB RAM.
I would like to get the patch list installed on the machine you compiled
postgresQL FROM YOU , so that I can compare with ours. It takes about 12kB.
Command for patch list
PHSS_30478 1.0 X11 Font Library Patch
PHSS_30791 1.0 XClients Periodic Patch
PHSS_30970 1.0 ld(1) and linker tools
# swlist > patchlist.txt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Haluk GÜNÇER" <halukguncer(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>; "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1678: pw_shadow BUS ERROR
> Hello Neil & Tom,
> I re-installed everthing many many times. I've also installed every
> libraries readline, zlib etc.
> Here, I have attached the debug output of the following command. I
> compiled everything in debug mode.
> As you requested I could not get detailed info via gdb.
> /usr/local/pgsql/bin/initdb -d -n > out.log 2>debug.log
> by the way, I succesfully installed 8.0.3 on fujitsu-siemens solaris 8.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
> Cc: "Haluk GÜNÇER" <halukguncer(at)hotmail(dot)com>; <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1678: pw_shadow BUS ERROR
>> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
>>> Weird -- it's difficult to see how there could be a problem in
>>> CreatePortal(), as that is both simple and widely used code.
>> The other interesting point is that we've certainly tested on HPUX
>> recently --- I know I've checked both 11.11 and 11.23 using HP's
>> testdrive machines. So the question here is not so much "why doesn't
>> PG work on HPUX" as "what weird configuration are you using?"
>> regards, tom lane
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-06-03 14:29:56|
|Subject: Re: BUG #1678: pw_shadow BUS ERROR |
|Previous:||From: John Hansen||Date: 2005-06-03 14:10:51|
|Subject: Re: BUG #1698: Different behavior in UNIQUE and DISTINCT|