| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg(at)alleroedderne(dot)adsl(dot)dk>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |
| Date: | 2011-05-31 18:13:43 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTiniiWnqDfNc8DPaw=JT4sB3E6m3YQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 19:59, Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com> wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 01:13 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Just to be clear, crawling the current archives for this info is
>> probably the easiest part of the whole project. In fact, the majority
>> of the information you'd need is *already* in a postgresql database on
>> search.postgresql.org.
>
> Does that database have the bug number, PG version and OS as separate
> columns, or is it simply an index over all the messages across all the
> lists? I think a table just of bug info would be useful at this time,
> e.g., to load a potential candidate. However, the message database --if
> it includes the message bodies-- would obviously be easier to work with
> than web crawling.
It does not have all those details, but it has the sender, subject and
bodies broken out. So it's definitely an easier starting point.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-05-31 18:14:26 | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-05-31 18:05:45 | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |