Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Process local hint bit cache

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Process local hint bit cache
Date: 2011-06-29 13:43:57
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>                        int ByteOffset = xid / BITS_PER_BYTE;
>>> whoops, I just notice this was wrong -- the byte offset needs to be
>>> taking bucket into account.  I need to clean this up some more
>>> obviously, but the issues at play remain the same....
>> So, where is the latest version of this patch?

Oh, shoot.  When I looked at this last night, I thought that link went
somewhere else.  Woops.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Yeb HavingaDate: 2011-06-29 13:44:18
Subject: Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery)
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-06-29 13:42:06
Subject: Re: Avoid index rebuilds for no-rewrite ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group