Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: seeking advices for function

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jean-Yves F(dot) Barbier" <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: seeking advices for function
Date: 2011-06-22 21:27:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-novice
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Jean-Yves F. Barbier <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:07:16 -0500, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> ...
>> I think it's much better to use the database log to record security
>> violations.
> Ok, so I suppose I have to use such a program as pg_fouine (or even just a
> script with greps) and email results to the DBA.
>> Wrapping SQL with a function like this is going to be a
>> problem factory.  For example, it's a total optimization fence if you
>> ever need to do something like join against your 'view'.  IMO, it's a
>> total non-starter.
> This function is to be used against only one table; for joined queries,
> I intend to use the same kind of function, however involving all needed tables.
> The goal is (if possible) eliminate views because if I've got 200 user
> profiles, I'll be obliged to generate 200 x (many)viewS.

why in the world do you need to create one view/user/table?  that is
absolutely something you would want to avoid...


In response to


pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Jean-Yves F. BarbierDate: 2011-06-22 21:55:29
Subject: Re: seeking advices for function
Previous:From: Jean-Yves F. BarbierDate: 2011-06-22 20:45:26
Subject: Re: seeking advices for function

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group