On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Some actions aren't even transactional, such as DROP DATABASE, amongst
> Good point. We'd probably need to add a timestamp to the drop
> database record, as that's a case that people would likely want to
> defend against with this feature.
This means that recovery_target_* code would also need to deal with
DROP DATABASE case.
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2011-07-01 00:24:30|
|Subject: Re: time-delayed standbys|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-06-30 23:25:00|
|Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks, v4|