Re: [WIP] UNNEST(REFCURSOR): allowing SELECT to consume data from a REFCURSOR

From: Dent John <denty(at)QQdd(dot)eu>
To:
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Roman Pekar <roma(dot)pekar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [WIP] UNNEST(REFCURSOR): allowing SELECT to consume data from a REFCURSOR
Date: 2020-03-06 21:36:15
Message-ID: B6F4C2F0-07E9-468B-8E91-147148FC782E@QQdd.eu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 22 Feb 2020, at 10:38, Dent John <denty(at)QQdd(dot)eu> wrote:
>
>> On 18 Feb 2020, at 03:03, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> From the trivialities department, I see a bunch of warnings about
>> local declaration placement (we're still using C90 rules for those by
>> project policy):
>>
>> […]
>
> […]

My bad. I missed on declaration.

Another patch attached.

d.

Attachment Content-Type Size
unnest-refcursor-v7a.patch application/octet-stream 32.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-06 22:15:09 Re: Re[4]: bool_plperl transform
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-03-06 21:33:10 Re: explain HashAggregate to report bucket and memory stats