| From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: contrib/snapshot |
| Date: | 2011-01-02 22:11:25 |
| Message-ID: | B57B412C-E307-4D37-9B7F-9CBE70D1BDF1@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 31, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> 2010/12/31 Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> Please call it something other than "snapshot". There's already about 3
> tools called something similar and a couple of different meanings of the
> term in the world of Postgres.
>
>
> Thanks, good point.
> Renamed to fsnapshot.
Is it actually limited to functions? ISTM this concept would be valuable for anything that's not in pg_class (in other words, anything that doesn't have user data in it).
Also, I'm not sure why this needs to be in contrib vs pgFoundry.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2011-01-02 22:51:13 | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-01-02 21:45:29 | Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either |