Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: contrib/snapshot

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib/snapshot
Date: 2011-01-02 22:11:25
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Dec 31, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> 2010/12/31 Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> Please call it something other than "snapshot". There's already about 3
> tools called something similar and a couple of different meanings of the
> term in the world of Postgres.
> Thanks, good point.
> Renamed to fsnapshot.

Is it actually limited to functions? ISTM this concept would be valuable for anything that's not in pg_class (in other words, anything that doesn't have user data in it).

Also, I'm not sure why this needs to be in contrib vs pgFoundry.
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                   jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell)               

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2011-01-02 22:51:13
Subject: Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>)
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-01-02 21:45:29
Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group