From: | "Sivakumar K" <sivakumark(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Kathy Lo" <kathy(dot)lo(dot)ky(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Using Which Driver [correct] |
Date: | 2005-09-06 05:50:28 |
Message-ID: | B4AF8C04F762D246A1E38EC5DFAEFC0B04EFE3@blrmail2.aus.pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Hi Kathy,
psqlodbc-08.00.0102 is the official ODBC driver of the
PostgreSQL community. This driver is also partially 3.x compliant
whereas the driver provided by unixODBC is ODBC 2 compliant. Also
psqlodbc-08.00.0102 has lot of bug fixes gone into it.
I believe the ODBC driver by unixODBC is little bit old.
I would suggest you to go and have your hands on libpq enabled ODBC
driver.
Regards,
Siva Kumar.K
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Kathy Lo
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:38 AM
To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [ODBC] Using Which Driver [correct]
Dear all,
I had installed Postgresql 8.0.3 as database server under Redhat Linux
9.0.
Also, I had installed unixODBC 2.2.11 and psqlodbc.so (generated from
psqlodbc-08.00.0102.tar.gz) under Redhat Linux 9.0 as client.
When I want to make ODBC connection to the database, I don't know which
driver should be used.
unixODBC 2.2.11 provides
libodbcpsql.so.2.0.0
libodbcpsqlS.so.1.0.0
From psqlodbc-08.00.0102.tar.gz, I installed
psqlodbc.so
Please provide me more information on the difference of these 2 driver.
And, from psqlodbc-08.00.0102.tar.gz, I did not find psqlodbcS.so while
unixODBC provides it.
I know that libodbcpsqlS.so is the Setup library for Postgresql. Am I
right? And, why psqlodbc-08.00.0102.tar.gz does not provide this
library?
Thank for your kindly help!
Kathy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-09-06 07:31:14 | Re: Continuing encoding fun.... |
Previous Message | Anoop Kumar | 2005-09-06 05:25:16 | Re: Continuing encoding fun.... |