Re: Next development steps?

Hi Dave,

We have not moved from Pervasive :-)

I was watching the activities going on in the list (Could not get into
much because was very busy) and Ludek indeed deserves an applause for
his active presence in the list.

In my opinion, we should look for the possibility of reworking the
CC_mapping function (which maps PGresult class to QResultClass) to
increase the performance. As Ludek pointed out, we must identify the
code to be cleaned up in different parts of the driver.

Dave, can you add Siva also to the developer list? I think he deserves
it because of his great contributions to the development of the libpq
version of psqlodbc, and the further enhancements.

Regards,
Anoop

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-odbc-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Dave Page
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 10:54 PM
> To: Sivakumar K; Ludek Finstrle
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Next development steps?
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sivakumar K [mailto:sivakumark(at)aztec(dot)soft(dot)net]
> > Sent: 14 December 2005 17:12
> > To: Ludek Finstrle; Dave Page
> > Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: RE: [ODBC] Next development steps?
> >
> >
> > I believe I can find some time to hang around here.
> >
>
> Great, thanks - will be useful to have you around :-)
>
> BTW, have you moved from Pervasive?
>
> (Luf; Sivakumar worked with Anoop on the libpq conversion).
>
> Regards, Dave
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster