| From: | Thomas F(dot)O'Connell <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: FAQ -- Index usage/speed |
| Date: | 2004-08-31 19:12:30 |
| Message-ID: | B46D902C-FB81-11D8-A844-000D93AE0944@sitening.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
I thought about that, and it seems like the upgrade path from 7.x ->
8.x is going to be slower than among any of the 7.x releases. 8.0 is
still several months away and it will probably be several months more
before people who are affected by this issue in production databases.
The other thing I thought about was a caveat in the 7.x documentation
under indexes, as it doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere. That would
keep it off the general FAQ but let folks using 7.x releases know about
it.
-tfo
On Aug 31, 2004, at 2:05 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, 4.8 would be the right spot. Not sure why we got so many reports
> recently though.
>
> However, with this fixed in 8.0, it probably isn't worth adding to the
> FAQ.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-31 19:17:17 | Re: FAQ -- Index usage/speed |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-31 19:05:54 | Re: FAQ -- Index usage/speed |