Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans.

From: David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>
To: Pierre C <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
Cc: "Dimitri Fontaine" <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans.
Date: 2010-02-19 02:31:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Feb 18, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Pierre C wrote:

>> What about catching the error in the application and INSERT'ing  
>> into the
>> current preprepare.relation table? The aim would be to do that in  
>> dev or
>> in pre-prod environments, then copy the table content in production.
> Yep, but it's a bit awkward and time-consuming, and not quite suited  
> to ORM-generated requests since you got to generate all the plan  
> names, when the SQL query itself would be the most convenient  
> "unique identifier"...
> A cool hack would be something like that :
> pg_execute( "SELECT ...", arguments... )
> By inserting a hook which calls a user-specified function on non- 
> existing plan instead of raising an error, this could work.
> However, this wouldn't work as-is since the plan name must be <=  
> NAMEDATALEN, but you get the idea ;)

How about the SHA1 hash of the query?  Hey, it works for git... :-)


David Christensen
End Point Corporation

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2010-02-19 02:40:30
Subject: Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql
Previous:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2010-02-19 02:26:29
Subject: Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group