Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, yuzuko <yuzukohosoya(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables
Date: 2022-03-31 10:17:42
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 28 Mar 2022, at 15:05, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> I've pushed the last version, and backpatched it to 10 (not sure I'd
> call it a bugfix, but I certainly agree with Justin it's worth
> mentioning in the docs, even on older branches).

I happened to spot a small typo in this commit in the ANALYZE docs, and have
just pushed a fix all the way down to 10 as per the original commit.

Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-03-31 10:46:59 Re: BUG #17448: In Windows 10, version 1703 and later, huge_pages doesn't work.
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2022-03-31 10:09:35 Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas