| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Extension upgrade, patch v0: debug help needed |
| Date: | 2011-01-03 19:51:14 |
| Message-ID: | ADFA83C2-736E-4EFA-A01F-E9EB6D243B45@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 3, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> I rather doubt that "WRAPPER" will be accepted as a reserved word in the grammar.
>
> It's already in the grammar, and I didn't change its "level".
Okay.
>>> dim=# create wrapper extension lo;
>>> CREATE EXTENSION
>>
>> What happened to your UPGRADE from NULL idea?
>
> You upgrade an installed extension, right?
What?
>>> The WRAPPER keyword meaning is that we're only creating the catalog
>>> entry, forcing version to NULL and not running the extension's script.
>>> This keyword looked like the best choice from existing ones in our
>>> grammar, please feel free to pick any other phrase here.
>>
>> I don't see why it's necessary at all.
>
> Care to offer an alternative or go in any level of details about what
> you have in mind and how *exactly* you think it should work? I've not
> been offered psychic powers this Christmas, sorry…
That's what I understood your original "UPGRADE from NULL" being. Did I misread you?
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-03 19:51:36 | Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers (was: Extensions, patch v16) |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-01-03 19:49:44 | Re: Extension upgrade, patch v0: debug help needed |