Re: Statement-level rollback

From: "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Statement-level rollback
Date: 2017-10-31 17:47:25
Message-ID: ADCA7A78C51948E39600409FCF7FFF13@tunaPC
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

From: Simon Riggs
On 14 August 2017 at 23:58, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2/28/17 02:39, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
>> The code for stored functions is not written yet, but I'd like your
feedback for the specification and design based on the current patch.
I'll add this patch to CommitFest 2017-3.
>
> This patch needs to be rebased for the upcoming commit fest.

I'm willing to review this if the patch is going to be actively worked
on.

I'm very sorry I couldn't reply to your kind offer. I rebased the
patch and will add it to CF 2017/11. I hope I will complete the patch
in this CF.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

Attachment Content-Type Size
stmt_rollback_v2.patch application/octet-stream 22.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2017-11-01 12:55:06 Re: Could pgsql jdbc support pool reauthentication?
Previous Message Achilleas Mantzios 2017-10-31 11:52:06 Re: Could pgsql jdbc support pool reauthentication?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-10-31 17:55:48 Re: MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2017-10-31 17:47:06 Re: Re: Anyone have experience benchmarking very high effective_io_concurrency on NVME's?