| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <kgeis(at)speakeasy(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: tuning/profiling |
| Date: | 2005-10-19 23:35:21 |
| Message-ID: | AD4D9731-D334-494B-8227-F43C3A8E8924@fastcrypt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
I'm not talking about sharing a connection between multiple threads.
However there are
sections of the driver that do share data. Specifically the meta data
You may be right, we may not have to worry about some sections .
Dave
On 19-Oct-05, at 7:18 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> If you're talking about connection pooling, the pool should have
> synchronization around obtaining and returning connections, or
> you would have serious problems. Are you talking about any
> other sharing of connections among multiple threads?
>
> -Kevin
>
>
>>>> Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> >>>
>>>>
>
> Huh ? any web application would be sharing connections, and the
> driver itself
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2005-10-19 23:59:51 | Re: PGInterval setMinutes unrecognize ??? |
| Previous Message | andy petrella | 2005-10-19 23:32:11 | PGInterval setMinutes unrecognize ??? |