Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Justin Pitts <justinpitts(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "david(at)lang(dot)hm" <david(at)lang(dot)hm>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-02 21:25:00
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
> With all
> due respect, I consider myself smarter than the optimizer.  I'm 6'4", 235LBS
> so telling me that you disagree and that I am more stupid than a computer
> program,  would not be a smart thing to do. Please, do not misunderestimate
> me.

I don't see computer programs make thinly veiled threats, especially
in a public forum.
I'll do what you claim is not the smart thing and disagree with you.
You are wrong.
You are dragging the signal-to-noise ratio of this discussion down.
You owe Greg an apology.

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Mladen GogalaDate: 2011-02-02 21:59:50
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-02 21:19:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-02-02 21:25:02
Subject: Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-02-02 21:20:44
Subject: Re: Per-column collation, the finale

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group