On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2010/11/29 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil <killteck(at)seznam(dot)cz> wrote:
>>> I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs (similar as on ORACLE).
>>> Is that good idea?
>> I doubt it. Why would we want to do that?
> If I understand, it allows a local copy of DTD, .. so then is possible
> to provide a fast DTD checking.
But that could equally well be stored in a user table rather than a
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2010-11-29 17:49:12|
|Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-11-29 17:35:49|
|Subject: Re: pg_execute_from_file review|