| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomáš Pospíšil <killteck(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, chmelab(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: PROPOSAL of xmlvalidate |
| Date: | 2010-11-29 17:36:37 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinjmVmY53BgdXUHecZm+vX5yW92HsRENO9fOHpE@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2010/11/29 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil <killteck(at)seznam(dot)cz> wrote:
>>> I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs (similar as on ORACLE).
>>>
>>> Is that good idea?
>>
>> I doubt it. Why would we want to do that?
>
> If I understand, it allows a local copy of DTD, .. so then is possible
> to provide a fast DTD checking.
But that could equally well be stored in a user table rather than a
system table.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2010-11-29 17:49:12 | Re: profiling connection overhead |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-29 17:35:49 | Re: pg_execute_from_file review |