Re: git: uh-oh

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> The fact that the file was "modified" twice after being removed at rev
>>> 2.88 seems really wacko.  Are you sure that's not contributing to what
>>> we're seeing here?
>>
>> Yeah, that was discussed in the earlier git-conversion thread that I
>> pointed to.  We never did figure out how that happened, though I
>> speculated it might have been due to weirdness in Vadim's local
>> checkout.
>>
>> Is it possible to just delete those two revisions from the CVS
>> repository, and if so would it help?  We certainly don't need 'em.
>
> cvs admin -o ?

Magnus, is this something that you can try? Prune those could of
wonky revisions after the delete and before the re-add prior to
running the conversion, and see how that comes out?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company