Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Another proposal for table synonyms

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another proposal for table synonyms
Date: 2010-12-02 20:27:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mié dic 01 17:13:35 -0300 2010:
>> > Well, porting applications from other database systems that support synonyms
>> > (i.e. Oracle, DB2, SQL Server).
>> SQL Server supports synonyms?  If it's not Oracle-only, it's a more
>> powerful argument to have the feature.
> I think it's worth mentioning that in SQL Server, synonyms are not
> schema-qualified; they're "global" objects.

Seems like they have more than one kind.

The section entitled "notes on public synonyms" is particularly
interesting, as it seems to imply that under some but not all
conditions synonyms get materialized inside schemas that use them.
The list of objects for which they support synonyms is also

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-12-02 20:43:50
Subject: Re: Another proposal for table synonyms
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-12-02 19:52:27
Subject: Re: directory archive format for pg_dump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group