| From: | satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG Documentation Improvement |
| Date: | 2010-06-19 01:01:05 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinex1lEA0rXBAhCjEjQBlvhYp5zln_9J58CZyyz@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-interfaces |
Heikki,
Thanks for the comments.
On 6/19/2010 0:56 Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> A reference of all the directives seems useful, but it seems at least
> partially redundant with what's there already. WHENEVER for example is
> quite well documented at
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/ecpg-errors.html already.
Yes. One of the things what I'm afraid is that point.
How could we (re-)organize the document structure to eliminate such redundancy?
Is this necessary?
Any suggestions?
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-22 03:42:03 | hot standby documentation |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-06-18 15:56:37 | Re: ECPG Documentation Improvement |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Murray Cumming | 2010-06-19 23:54:14 | Initial database size on disk |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-06-18 15:56:37 | Re: ECPG Documentation Improvement |