Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Date: 2011-02-23 14:46:34
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Personally, I think the first thing we ought to do is add a real, bona
>> fide planner hint to override the selectivity calculation manually,
>> maybe something like this:
>> WHERE (x < 5 AND y = 1) SELECTIVITY (0.1);
> If you're going to go that far, why not just collect statistics on
> that specific predicate?
> ie,  ANALYZE SELECTIVITY ON tablename (x, y) WHERE (x < 5 AND y = 1);
> Then it won't fall subject to all of the pitfalls that Tom outlines below.
> Selectivities are easy to estimate if we know the predicate. They only
> become hard when they have to work for every possible predicate.

Fair point.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-23 14:48:13
Subject: Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-02-23 13:46:09
Subject: Re: How to extract a value from a record using attnum or attname?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group