Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Date: 2010-09-01 16:03:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm not sure what we should aim for in the first phase. But if you want as
> little code as possible yet have something useful, I think 'replay' mode
> with no standby registration is the way to go.

IMHO, less is more.  Trying to do too much at once can cause us to
miss the release window (and can also create more bugs).  We just need
to leave the door open to adding later whatever we leave out now.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-09-01 16:08:04
Subject: Re: array_agg() NULL Handling
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-09-01 16:02:12
Subject: Re: array_agg() NULL Handling

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group