Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: More then 1600 columns?

From: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More then 1600 columns?
Date: 2010-11-12 07:17:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
Hey Mark,

Yeah, I can't imagine an entity in a real project even with more than 100
columns. Its rare case.
But if you entities (rows/tuples) of some class (table) can contains
set of columns (properties) you can look at hstore contrib module.

2010/11/12 John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>

> On 11/11/10 9:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Mark Mitchell"<mmitchell(at)riccagroup(dot)com>  writes:
>>> Is there are hard limit of 1600 that you cannot get around?
>> Yes.
>> Generally, wanting more than a few dozen columns is a good sign that you
>> need to rethink your schema design.  What are you trying to accomplish
>> exactly?
> indeed.    I'd say a good read on 'data normalization' and the Third Normal
> Form would be in order.
> relational databases are *not* spreadsheets (and, for that matter,
> spreadsheets make lousy relational databases)
> if these 1600+ elements come from an ORM, you probably need to rethink your
> object model, as no sane object class should have that many members.
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:

// Dmitriy.

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: mbwlDate: 2010-11-12 07:27:05
Subject: Re: Instructions/status of modpglogger
Previous:From: John R PierceDate: 2010-11-12 06:15:48
Subject: Re: More then 1600 columns?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group