On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> So did the materialized views patch not get submitted?
I think someone else will need to pick it up and do a bunch more work
with it before it can be considered a serious candidate for commit.
The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-09-13 12:13:10|
|Subject: Re: Reducing walreceiver latency with a latch|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-09-13 11:57:42|
|Subject: Re: update on global temporary and unlogged tables|
pgsql-rrreviewers by date
|Next:||From: Hitoshi Harada||Date: 2010-09-13 13:15:24|
|Subject: top-level DML under CTEs|
|Previous:||From: Thom Brown||Date: 2010-09-13 11:44:38|
|Subject: Re: [RRR] CommitFest 2010-07 final report|