On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Could we get away with something as simple as "requested operation is
> not supported for <plural-form-of-object-type>"?
+1. If so, will we have a function to get object names something like
GetPluralFormOfObjectType(Relation rel or char relkind) => char * ?
> But that breaks our guideline about assembling
> translatable strings from small pieces. Maybe it'd be OK if the piece
> is just a fragment of SQL syntax, though - not sure.
Agreed. <requested-operation> should be a SQL syntax,
so we won't have to translate the part.
--
Itagaki Takahiro