Re: Postgresql security checks

From: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Machiel Richards <machielr(at)rdc(dot)co(dot)za>, "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql security checks
Date: 2010-09-08 19:20:50
Message-ID: AANLkTimtMsoTkpD6GMFxsTfhHPncp+rPtAysxtCs+-Td@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 8 September 2010 00:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yes, you are right.  Should this be documented?  Where?
>
> Whether it needs documenting, I'm not sure, but if it were to go
> anywhere, I believe it would be here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-authid.html

I sent in a suggested doc change to that pg_authid page a few days ago:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00031.php

Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias Leopold 2010-09-09 09:53:15 logging table changes
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2010-09-08 13:24:32 Re: PostgreSQL article online - PDF