| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml |
| Date: | 2010-12-11 04:27:36 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimoOFAN+akgYcmXuHiPSFjtvFCjWrKRrcEb966f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I found some obsolete descriptions in pg_ctl-ref.sgml.
> Could you apply the attached patch?
I'm just as happy to retain "saves and reuses" vs. just "reuses", but
the rest of this looks right, so committed.
>> Notes
>>
>> Waiting for complete startup is not a well-defined operation and
>> might fail if access control is set up so that a local client cannot
>> connect without manual interaction (e.g., password authentication).
>> For additional connection variables, see Section 31.13, and for
>> passwords, also see Section 31.14.
>
> The above also seems to be obsolete, thanks to recently-introduced
> PQping. Can we remove that?
Should we remove only the first sentence and keep the second one, or
is it more appropriate to remove the whole thing?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-12-13 04:21:51 | Re: Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-12-09 11:45:23 | Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml |