Re: Query history mystery box

On 21 September 2010 21:40, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le 21/09/2010 22:05, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> Le 21/09/2010 14:37, Thom Brown a écrit :
>>> On 21 September 2010 13:31, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>>> Le 21/09/2010 14:25, Thom Brown a écrit :
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the query history box should be labelled, or at least have a
>>>>> tooltip.  A colleague of mine was confused by the presence of the new
>>>>> drop-down box with no indication as to what this was.  And to make
>>>>> matters worse, when he went to the help guide, the screenshot doesn't
>>>>> show this drop-down.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The documentation is not good. We need to work on that for next release.
>>>> One of the issues we are facing is the format we should use. Right now,
>>>> every thing is a mixed of PHP and HTML, which is great for translation,
>>>> but bad if we want to find writers that aren't coders too.
>>>>
>>>> But before that, updating some screenshots would be a pretty good idea.
>>>> Everyone is welcomed to contribute this way.
>>>>
>>>>> Could it be made clearer what the function of this box is.  Like
>>>>> "Previous queries" or "Statement history".  And update the help to
>>>>> show this with an explaination as to its function?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could be done, yeah. If you think it's much better for the user, that's
>>>> something quite easy and quick to do.
>>>
>>> Yes, I think it's pretty much essential as otherwise it leaves the
>>> user to guess as to its function.  Another idea is for it to say
>>> "Select From Statement History" as the default entry (if there is a
>>> history to select from), and whatever the user selects from the
>>> history overwrite this.
>>>
>>
>> Nope. Attached is a patch that adds a tooltip...
>>
>>> And it appears the user can type stuff into this field too.  Shouldn't
>>> that be non-editable?
>>>
>>
>> ... and makes the combobox read-only.
>>
>> I'm gonna work on another patch to add a label, but it will be for the
>> next release.
>>
>
> See the screenshot attached. Seems good to you?
>
> Patch attached.

That's perfect! Yes, I think that'll make its function clear.

Thanks Guillaume. :)

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935