| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Elliot Chance <elliotchance(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>) |
| Date: | 2011-01-02 22:51:13 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimLW5CDDkJX=pe7_dC_463LRS5ijaz0wQQ1w-gL@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
I believe that Dave Page wants to move to building pg for windows
using visual C++ 2010 some time this year. That alone may be enough of
a reason to check for C++0x keywords in headers:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2010/04/06/c-0x-core-language-features-in-vc10-the-table.aspx
I think that there is likely to be an expectation that the same
compiler that is used to build pg should be able to include pg headers
in C++ TUs.
--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-01-02 23:06:23 | Re: CSV-bulk import and defaults |
| Previous Message | Thomas Schmidt | 2011-01-02 22:22:14 | CSV-bulk import and defaults |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2011-01-02 23:17:42 | Re: How to know killed by pg_terminate_backend |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-01-02 22:11:25 | Re: contrib/snapshot |