Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints
Date: 2010-06-09 00:47:20
Message-ID: AANLkTimDVCDmWgvihY7Xt3hZiPaNcQg8Ue6A5ABry3bK@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I prefer archive_cleanup_command. We should name things after their
>> principal function, not an implementation detail, IMNSHO.
>
> Weak preference for archive_cleanup_command here.

OK, sounds like we have consensus on that. Who wants to do it?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-09 01:38:17 Re: How about closing some Open Items?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-09 00:34:02 Re: Idea for getting rid of VACUUM FREEZE on cold pages