Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers

From: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers
Date: 2011-01-26 15:48:36
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:38 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:

> I'm thinking that we should consider *very* carefully before we
> introduce payments into what had been an all-volunteer effort.  You
> may get people to do things they might not otherwise have done, but
> you'll also make people wonder whether they should be volunteering at
> all.
> Offhand, I'd say this is a really bad idea.<>

Wow, I hadn't considered this.

But I'm reminded of GSOC, which is essentially doing something similar.  Has
this effect already taken place among the volunteering patch writers?

Richard Broersma Jr.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-01-26 16:01:28
Subject: Re: SSI patch version 14
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-26 15:46:57
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove arbitrary ALTER TABLE .. ADD COLUMN restriction.

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2011-01-26 17:31:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2011-01-26 15:38:01
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group