| From: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sean Crowley <sean(dot)crowley(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Ken(dot)Rosensteel" <Ken(dot)Rosensteel(at)bull(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres References |
| Date: | 2010-11-08 19:15:05 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTim36tZKnOOLuM+YYMb+SJRzf99aoxBKdfqfO+ZP@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Sean Crowley
<sean(dot)crowley(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> NTT may not be on that list because they are an EnterpriseDB customer and
> they are using Postgres Plus Advanced Server not the community PostgreSQL.
That makes sense. But should Yahoo be even be listed then, since
their fork of Postgresql is even more drastic than EnterpriseDB's?
Also, NTT seems to be heavily invested in the community version since
they're participating in the development of some of its nicer
features.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-11-08 19:41:03 | Re: Postgres References |
| Previous Message | Sean Crowley | 2010-11-08 19:14:45 | Re: Postgres References |