Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache

From: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Date: 2010-06-15 23:09:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> wrote:
> swampler(at)noao(dot)edu (Steve Wampler) writes:
>> Or does losing WAL files mandate a new initdb?
> Losing WAL would mandate initdb, so I'd think this all fits into the
> set of stuff worth putting onto ramfs/tmpfs.  Certainly it'll all be
> significant to the performance focus.

why is that? isn't simply execute pg_resetxlog enough? specially
'cause OP doesn't care about loosing some transactions

Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-06-15 23:18:19
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Previous:From: Yeb HavingaDate: 2010-06-15 19:33:06
Subject: Re: B-Heaps

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group