Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Found a Bug in latest Driver (I THINK) and pg 8.4

From: Jason Tesser <jasontesser(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Found a Bug in latest Driver (I THINK) and pg 8.4
Date: 2010-06-02 09:20:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
So Kris you are obviously aware of the issue. Who do i need to talk to or is
there someone on here that can confirm if it is possible to get this
included in the driver?

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Jason Tesser <jasontesser(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Right in my case my schema changes as each organization has a separate
> schema.
> I would love to be able to set the schema with the typeName.  Why couldn't
> that be a seperate attribute in Java setLookupSchema and if not set function
> as it does now. Wouldn't this handle both cases.
> While I know I am using an outside case I do think it is a valid one.
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Jason Tesser wrote:
>>  The issue with teh driver is that when you use a composite type as an
>>> parameter of a STored Proc teh Driver queries the pg_catalog but from
>>> what I
>>> can tell has no way of telling what schema to query for.
>> Right, the JDBC driver's internal knowledge of types has no information
>> about schemas or the search path.  It currently assumes the name alone is a
>> unique identifier.  Fixing this to respect the search path wouldn't be that
>> tough by using the regtype type, but we want to cache this information to
>> avoid repeated type lookups, so it wouldn't change as the search_path
>> changed.  The other approach to fixing things would be to allow the user to
>> specify the schema with the type name, but I don't think people want to do
>> that because the schema may not be known to the application.
>> Kris Jurka

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2010-06-02 10:03:30
Subject: Re: Found a Bug in latest Driver (I THINK) and pg 8.4
Previous:From: Craig RingerDate: 2010-06-02 06:02:49
Subject: Re: jdbc works in java app, fails in servlet: "no suitable jdbc found"

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group