| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Spread checkpoint sync |
| Date: | 2011-01-29 13:13:04 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikscc25CJsV=yue2QoibX0S4MsSWun5ETFNYLER@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Where there are still very ugly maximum latency figures here in every case,
> these periods just aren't as wide with the patch in place.
OK, committed the patch, with some additional commenting, and after
fixing the compiler warning Chris Browne noticed.
> P.S. Yes, I know I have other review work to do as well. Starting on the
> rest of that tomorrow.
*cracks whip*
Man, this thing doesn't work at all.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Rosin | 2011-01-29 13:26:24 | Re: [Mingw-users] mingw64 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-01-29 13:09:33 | Re: REVIEW: WIP: plpgsql - foreach in |