Re: Spread checkpoint sync

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spread checkpoint sync
Date: 2011-01-29 13:13:04
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Where there are still very ugly maximum latency figures here in every case,
> these periods just aren't as wide with the patch in place.

OK, committed the patch, with some additional commenting, and after
fixing the compiler warning Chris Browne noticed.

> P.S. Yes, I know I have other review work to do as well.  Starting on the
> rest of that tomorrow.

*cracks whip*

Man, this thing doesn't work at all.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Rosin 2011-01-29 13:26:24 Re: [Mingw-users] mingw64
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2011-01-29 13:09:33 Re: REVIEW: WIP: plpgsql - foreach in