2011/3/16 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 22:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > My only hesitation about this is that it seems like sync rep and
>> > collation support are both still pretty broken. Should we just not
>> > worry about that for alpha?
>> FWIW, collations are probably still several days away from being
>> noticeably less broken than they were in alpha4. I have mixed
>> about whether an alpha5 right now is useful.
> Fair enough. Looks like we will skip next week, too.
Yeah, probably best. I think we're making good progress, though, so I
propose we wrap alpha5 on Monday, March 28. I don't think we'll be
all the way there yet by then, but I think we will have made enough
progress that it makes sense to get another snapshot out the door and
into the hands of testers.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-03-17 19:39:19|
|Subject: Re: Allowing multiple concurrent base backups|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2011-03-17 18:31:08|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5842: Memory leak in PL/Python when taking slices of results|