On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Kevin Grittner
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> it would be annoying to have to checkpoint after a data load
> Heck, in my world it's currently pretty much a necessity to run
> VACUUM FREEZE ANALYZE on a table after a data load before it's
> reasonable to expose the table to production use. It would hardly
> be an inconvenience to also run a CHECKPOINT.
The goal here is to make that better, not worse!
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Florian Pflug||Date: 2010-12-01 15:58:48|
|Subject: Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-12-01 15:36:51|
|Subject: Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three|