Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Sync Rep Design

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sync Rep Design
Date: 2010-12-31 14:13:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
<stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
>> What's weird about using the role name?  That's our standard way of
>> distinguishing between two or more users.  Why invent something new?
> wel a user is not a host/server for me - given there is no real benefit from
> using distinct roles for each standby yet I don't see why we should
> complicate the replication setup procedure by requiring 1 role per standby.
> So I'm all for giving each standby a name but please make it an explicit one
> and not something that is only vaguely related to the actual standby host.

OK.  If that's the consensus, can someone post a patch?

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-12-31 14:38:29
Subject: Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-12-31 13:52:49
Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group