| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |
| Date: | 2011-02-12 13:19:09 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikM2VpD3baVgU+8tgWXfeTQrHBhgpw9RzEWCk-1@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Oleg,
>
> * Oleg Bartunov (oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su) wrote:
>> what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just
>> knn support and all examples are available in btree_gist.sql and sql
>> subdirectory. Contact me directly, if you have questions.
>
> It sure seems like
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/btree-gist.html could be and
> should be improved, in general.. If this module is really still just a
> test bed for GiST, then perhaps it's not a big deal..
I agree that the documentation there could be a lot better, but I
don't think that's a commit-blocker for this patch. However, "us
reaching beta" will be a commit-blocker.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-02-12 13:27:18 | Re: multiset patch review |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-02-12 12:47:16 | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2011-02-12 15:53:33 | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-02-12 12:47:16 | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |