| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 |
| Date: | 2011-01-03 19:26:28 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikC_iFCb8HH1reqjCCZ66G4JgTjZfStFV6kcVs+@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Incidentally, I just went looking for VS2005/Express on microsoft.com. I
> don't know if they still make it available, but if they do it's fairly well
> hidden. I could find VS2008/Express and VS2010/Express very easily. ISTM
> that having support on the live branches for the compilers/SDKs that
> Microsoft apparently actually supports and distributes is not a bad thing to
> have.
I agree.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-03 19:42:25 | Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers (was: Extensions, patch v16) |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-01-03 19:23:33 | Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 |