On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>>>> Speaking of running scripts, I think we should run pgindent now.
>>> Yeah, +1 for doing it as soon as Tom is at a good stopping point. It
>>> makes things a lot simpler later on.
>> IIRC the argument for an early pgindent run was to standardize the new
>> code for easier review. I expect to be spending a whole lot of time
>> reading collate and SSI code over the next few weeks, so I'm in favor
>> of pgindent'ing that stuff first. But I guess we need the typedef
>> list update before anything can happen.
> That's one good reason. Another is that this is presumably the time
> of the cycle when there are the fewest outstanding patches, making it
> a good time for changes that are likely to conflict with lots of other
> At any rate, it sounds like Andrew needs a few days to get the typedef
> list together, so let's wait for that to happen and then we'll see
> where we are.
Andrew, any update on this?
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-03-18 16:48:57|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-03-18 16:37:44|
|Subject: Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19|